An original photograph, a source rendering and an AI reconstruction answer different questions. The site labels generated or reconstructed imagery so it is not read as proof of a named client installation.
Keep the source relationship
A company case entry identifies the furniture scope listed in supplied materials. It does not by itself confirm quantities, contractual roles, completion dates or ownership of every visible object.
Update when better evidence arrives
Original high-resolution photography and confirmed project information can replace a visual study without losing the historical source record. Keep the asset version and the associated case identifier together.
Read the image type before drawing a conclusion
An original photograph, a rendering and an AI reconstruction provide different kinds of information. None should be relabelled as another type to make a project claim look stronger. Read the caption with the furniture scope and source reference.
Keep visual references separate from delivery evidence
The website’s generated imagery helps discuss appearance and room relationships. It does not establish who supplied every object, the actual quantities, the completion date or customer acceptance. Confirmed high-resolution originals can replace a study while preserving the record identifier.
Sources and image information
| Visual reference | How to use this information |
|---|---|
| Original photograph | An actual scene, once its identity and usage rights are confirmed; it is not a contract or a full supply list. |
| Rendering | A design representation, not evidence that the scene was built. |
| AI visual reference | A generated or reconstructed illustration; not a photograph of the named project. |
Source reference: A6
